Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.

Comments

No Responses to “”
  1. Edward Brown says:

    Niccolo Machiavelli, Alexander Hamilton and Napoleon Bonaparte are just a few of the progenitors of modern day charisma. Under “Charismatology,” (the study of charisma), charisma is not only a manifesting of self-expression, but a whole worldview. To determine a true charismatic, one must look at the total human being’s self -expression, biology, environmental conditioning and insecurities. The charismatic has a personal philosophy, ideology, theme and objective for shaping public opinion and making the world bend to his will. Power is a core motivating factor for charismatics, not only for narcissistic objectives, but because charismatics feel their ideas are better. The will to power separates the charismatic leader from all other leadership forms. Through sheer will and personality, the charismatic leader uses hybrid approaches best suited for the situation in achieving a goal. In this notion, the charismatic is “amoral”, closest to Nietzsche’s idea of the “Amoral Super Man.” To the charismatic, he has become a god. Before eminent sociologist Max Weber secularized “charisma,” it was a religious concept literally meaning in Greek, “Grace or gift in action”. The modern charismatic has self-deified the term to reconcile it with its spiritual roots. Only, today’s charismatic sees himself as the Alpha and Omega of its original higher-power form as a literal manifestation. Whether it is a charismatic politician or a charismatic cleric, he feigns praying to a Supreme Being when he is mentally praying to himself.

    Edward Brown
    Core Edge Image & Charisma Institute
    http://www.core-edge.com

  2. trish says:

    Great article, thanks!

  3. Gary Gross says:

    Please contact me when you offer this webinar again. Thanks!

  4. Jack Davenport says:

    How can a pay for performance system be implemented fairly when one group of employees is expected to follow company process control procedures, which slows down production, and a second group is allowed to operate with no regard to these procedures? Note: The group operating outside the pcp is the one being used to set the production standards.

    I would be interested to hear your thoughts.

    Thank you.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...